Rosin Steinhagen Mendel is a law firm dedicated to serving our clients in New York City, and the surrounding counties in southern New York State and in New Jersey.
We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights, permanency hearings, custody hearings, guardianship, administrative proceedings, and adoption. Our goal is to provide each of our clients with the best possible representation in all aspects of their cases, and clients appreciate our careful analysis of individual cases, through preparation and attention to detail.
Rosin Steinhagen Mendel is here to provide their clients with the highest level of representation in family matters. Visit us on the web at http://www.lawrsm.com/ for more information regarding your adoption and foster care concerns.
Monday, June 18, 2012
Dangerous Dog Lawyers
More dangerous dog cases have occurred over the years and Dangerous Dog Declarations and Dog Attack prosecutions can have a devastating effect on dog owners and their beloved pets. For over a decade, our lawyers have experience in dealing with dangerous dog attack cases and have developed techniques that have proven successful in defences to these prosecutions. We can refer you to the most respected 'temperamant assessors' in NSW; including assessors who train Council Rangers. We can draft the
'letter of objection' and 'undertakings' on your behalf; which can include a promise to always keep your dog on a leash when in public, to ensure your backyard is secure and to only allow adults to walk your dog.
At Sydney Criminal Lawyers, we understand how devastating it is for owners to have to turn in their dogs for a dangerous dog notice. Our experience in the field has given us extensive experience to persuade Councils to withdraw prosecutions and to influence councils not to issue dangerous dog declarations to owners. Our team is able to revoke dangerous dog declarations and can issue a nuisance dog order instead. Call us today if your family is in need of protecting your beloved pet at (02) 9261 8881 or visit us on the
web for more http://www.criminallaw.com.au/dangerous-dog-lawyers
'letter of objection' and 'undertakings' on your behalf; which can include a promise to always keep your dog on a leash when in public, to ensure your backyard is secure and to only allow adults to walk your dog.
At Sydney Criminal Lawyers, we understand how devastating it is for owners to have to turn in their dogs for a dangerous dog notice. Our experience in the field has given us extensive experience to persuade Councils to withdraw prosecutions and to influence councils not to issue dangerous dog declarations to owners. Our team is able to revoke dangerous dog declarations and can issue a nuisance dog order instead. Call us today if your family is in need of protecting your beloved pet at (02) 9261 8881 or visit us on the
web for more http://www.criminallaw.com.au/dangerous-dog-lawyers
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Court says judges can't decide draft complaint
The Supreme Court says federal employees cannot go to trial judges to complain about their firing for not signing up for the U.S. draft.
The high court ruled Monday that the Civil Service Reform Act took U.S. district courts' jurisdiction away from from judging these types of claims.
Several men lost their jobs in the executive branch for not signing up for Selective Service between the ages of 18 and 26. They sued, but at least two federal appeals courts ruled that they couldn't bring lawsuits straight to court because lawmakers had stripped trial judges of their jurisdiction.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a 6-3 decision saying the Merit Selection Protection Board must hear the case. Justices Samuel Alito, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan dissented.
The high court ruled Monday that the Civil Service Reform Act took U.S. district courts' jurisdiction away from from judging these types of claims.
Several men lost their jobs in the executive branch for not signing up for Selective Service between the ages of 18 and 26. They sued, but at least two federal appeals courts ruled that they couldn't bring lawsuits straight to court because lawmakers had stripped trial judges of their jurisdiction.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a 6-3 decision saying the Merit Selection Protection Board must hear the case. Justices Samuel Alito, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan dissented.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)